![]() ![]() Apple is likely to win, but courts often come up with compromise solutions.īut Apple has one ace up its sleeve if Epic "wins." Apple can just shut down the App Store and revert to only Apple-branded software like it used to have when the iPhone first came out. ![]() I think the crux of the matter is that Epic wants Apple to be forced to change its operating system and services to suit their purposes. It's entirely possible that resolving this issue in a clear way may require new laws. Although the courts can only interpret current laws, while the role of government is to create new laws. When the legality of something is questionable I welcome the role of the courts in resolving the question permanently. ![]() I am trying to read Epic's submission but it's hundreds of pages in length and scrolling through the document is painfully slow and the quality of the scan is not very good. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |